|
M P Darke on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:01:33 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Nature of CFIs
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Nature of CFIs
- From: M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1276671688; bh=zVI1GnuQEC3c2SGkMUVaM1JL4b67i/nH7MnaqoosNkQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TNSW1SFeuE81JY2J8UgUbuoaHUJeOTYSpQSrWPBsC897eyayHklahFR+VJ0W/+a7xT49y95QLVVPyZUEm8XkIQAKoydqAMksKyjgorAXtq5nzAtaEvTgQFBM2YKej3x12YfC1z5X8YMtllmrAbbUd4d+4KvsjIkWX9clOit1T+M=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3zGjVnHnTtu1F1LsBrtJfEpgvJFiz173Miedgk24oXbDbFCUzlWLf6EL9bk6ks+IJU9zHLTaQJ+PFHSGTPekhFtkPS9nrSOh8YhYza0GLATvJq/qdYMToLFm8ak/aBtpjxWstJrHuM9gbx7HmbYPbvEs/dL7ewy+XnWMMmGoP5I=;
- In-reply-to: <4C181592.5000802@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I don't understand what you meant, then. Why did you issue a CFI
> referring to "the judgement of CFI 112" when (at the time) no such
> judgement had been published?
I don't think I said anything about CFI 112 in the actual body of the CFI. I merely stated that CFI 112 had some bearing with regards to my submitting the CFI.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss