Sean Hunt on Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:18:36 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Continued voting and a new emergency |
On 03/13/2010 04:28 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
If emergencies aren't broken, they aren't broken and we can fix the game with one. If they are, then the previous emergency failed due to making B not a nomic (? this might need checking, how did precedence work then?)
Yeah, Rule 31 would have stepped in at some point, but only on the rules required to make B a nomic. I'll sort through it after dinner.
-coppro _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss