Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 109

[Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> JamesB wrote:
>
>>> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:03:15 -0500
>>> From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d]  Definitely not a Bribe Proposal
>>>
>>>
>>> I submit a CFI: "A proposal has been submitted which, if adopted,
>>> would award each player ten points."
>>>
>>> I name Marr596 as the Defendant.
>>
>> This is CFI 109. I assign CFI 109 Judge Murphy.
>
> I judge TRUE, but point out that Rule 50 section A neither prohibits
> submitting such a proposal nor nullifies its effects if adopted.

Agreed. I was mostly curious to get a judgement on the comment-delimiter issue.

(My own take on it would be to also rule true, on the theory that if
comment delimiters worked in proposals, there would be no way for them
to get into the ruleset as the attempt to include a comment on
proposed rule text would itself be commented out.)

> Proto-proposal:  Not everything is a kickback

FOR.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss