Craig Daniel on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:27:47 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Umm
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:27:42 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0MJAymW8e4oi0LiEsrjTlOZkZvhtfyeUgrppVn/giY4=; b=vnfIZq+/FlsC4jakO3RhNZcqpouD6idz3hBUP5G/1N/mzRhF2DbimeBC0gM6YaDDNw wKdqqw3/hou/vckG9fyxkyC7moIYsIclWxn470U3xLtMDhdMdrdHadqGQpERDcRUh112 Jg+J0IVCoqCbHWzTV4l47tSdpCBv39Phkpk+c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=acdoQjGu28Uamy80wTwWiussAzEXY06Gr7YCcycN/Gtqe8nkIg92DOkeJ1R0ccMriu SELP/jocYsL0ffUZtv7QIC6EEXk98s3Dg/FRjk05dMJcqv34LyNcKvJojIFMVZfmD5R/ 1HE9m4MMljc3FxvQdxsqrOotVN4pV0dxIWz7w=
- In-reply-to: <653283241001111106y5e8e8853ha7f93d3c5acc90ba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4B410A15.3060501@xxxxxxxxx> <653283241001111106y5e8e8853ha7f93d3c5acc90ba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Sean Hunt <rideau3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I forfeit.
>
> This doesn't appear to have any effect, as far as I can tell.
The common-sense definition of the word would come up, then, in which
case all it really means is coppro is a big ol' loser.
:D
(It's Joel right now, so you've got a day to get in a proposal to fix
this if you wish to.)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss