Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161

0x44 on Fri, 1 Jan 2010 08:21:29 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 31 Dec 2009.

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 31 Dec 2009.
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:21:27 -0600
In-reply-to: <137381.72004.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <137381.72004.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 1, 2010, at 8:34 AM, M P Darke wrote:

> I object to this ballot, as I submitted a proposal which has not been included in the ballot.

Publishing a ballot is not a dependent action and your proposal was not submitted in time to be included in this nweek's ballot, nor was it recognized by the Minister of Change. So your objection makes no difference.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 31 Dec 2009.
  - From: James Baxter

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 31 Dec 2009.
  - From: M P Darke

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 31 Dec 2009.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 31 Dec 2009.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 31 Dec 2009.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 31 Dec 2009.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread