|
Craig Daniel on Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:32:19 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Playerhood
|
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Playerhood
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:32:13 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tTLVjtRIEwUzSNKTRmQQSSTm3nlBiy4J7mr3fVQdkLU=; b=UPD4MWuFgfno/8CdTFnB9Ph/tl7PsaH3VhF34dTUsAGO7+71sw0iZiiN2PeOTidQ3c MINT5KPgx7wNipfAmK4+BH9mAvIuYMlCwsQdB3WV2PilK/40qi2RWcFf2A9OY3x9Xw8J /8n6ugDpBSgWeXcAEn5TesOlYxi5M8kmNmMzQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HEMtu6Qgs7CFfYHzzBQPummBhKu0ePJCzSrViWIkrnrkS/5H0CHDTGo4PBkg7g1nnl NGhs2Aznv2295f/siq67470Z/ecemrWJ6T+R5Kx0kQp+wB0mTNweanY/A1BBH0owNUvx UokYFpXe3JONKQzGdLR6nCMeTimtPIExFvV90=
- In-reply-to: <255869.55726.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <255869.55726.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Justin Ahmann
<quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I wish to become a Player.
My thoughts on this attempted scamette:
A player is an entity (per rule 13/0), so no single entity can be
multiple players. On the other hand, this attempt to become a player
clearly succeeds (per rule 33/0), so I think it makes you newly a
player and overrides the previous two attempts.
This would, to me, imply that "I become a player" when you are one
already is equivalent to deregistering and reregistering.
I'm going to let somebody else CFI the matter, though.
- teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss