Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] Judge assignments

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:46:16 -0800 (PST), Kerim Aydin
<kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, James Baxter wrote:
>>>>  - I won't let you do that, Starfox!
>>>
>>> I call for judgement on the statement, "The above-quoted text
>>> constitutes an objection to JamesB's intent to initiate an emergency."
>>
>> This is CFJ 23.
>>
>>> * teucer has supported JamesB's most recent intent to initiate an
> emergency.
> 
> As these are identical questions I defer to the earlier one and Judge
> 0x44.
> (If 0x44 doesn't judge for a few days, I expect to say false... "won't
let
> you do that" could be a threat to object as easily as it's an actual
> objection).

The text of your CFJ is "teucer has supported JamesB's most recent
intent..." 
not that Marr hasn't objected.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss