Re: [s-d] [s-b] If we're gonna play imperial nomic we might as well go a

Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:38:41 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] If we're gonna play imperial nomic we might as well go all out

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] If we're gonna play imperial nomic we might as well go all out
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:38:36 -0500
In-reply-to: <55b258c20911091027i1d958442ud2852d203021a1ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <55b258c20911091027i1d958442ud2852d203021a1ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> who actually thinks having a benevolent Cenobiarch is kind of neat

Hmm, and I just opened Gmail to announce that I've won by Junta and
carry out the Cleanup Procedure of removing Rule 126 :/
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread