Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160

Charles Walker on Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:31:48 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
From: Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:31:42 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2PkkDu5iCIAv0MwoEwmhT+dT/axTyF8AHPxzAg5OD34=; b=LHQjoDMgXc31P4H4yItI/a/GNgMeMnkZbuUoD1hPTy7x84D7rKRH3FjFkwUbib+DHf VUEO8FQTuYZWBIyxuUP/3albcK9e15TGXMYEZX8KeHxWAj9TNelZd1HZdoYAOlMKrR4F o5sH2+H+XLRpchKn9iGYWTI8KrMTDaTrdjmq0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=A1hmKg5cwpgIIB1LlxN4re82m+clOtHnlszI2OGq0x926EGz6FLaM+VQH3WuPMAGHR qQ2Dh67nn9E6bbqwdF5q0H2bR7XF7auKppb4wtHP2qDzoktfY2zNgmtoIeq9bUyZxSwt q71AF13Ynw7BVI/3QTRTdxzrLZDhZcsHyJacw=
In-reply-to: <55b258c20911041312s165e8ab4pdd0549d4928428a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <347567.75819.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <606cf17af6a1aed99065c4d3403c2081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20911041312s165e8ab4pdd0549d4928428a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/11/4 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:05 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Why do you think you're ineligible to vote for your own proposal?
>>
>
> Because e hasn't read the ruleset?

Proto: Make knowing what the Rules are a SHALL. Although generally
this couldn't be enforced, we could prosecute when people provide us
with strong evidence that they haven't read the rules, such as in
Marr's case.

-- 
Charles Walker
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: James Baxter

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread