Craig Daniel on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:28:53 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Some players are more equal than others
|
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Some players are more equal than others
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:28:45 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=bsE5bK/jTPBIEN3bBY1fD8/SBNx1m9rPx2XomsAaw+w=; b=BNCLb/zMMfnFbC2Bnx8MvhC2rNomHOIB3DvVB2a1/3DLD0Y+p8JUHX7HUDlixr9vXM AYXbQTAwMCXh8VFx/wQjpeChASkSMjYAP01xdgUZX9DZ+1MNiRsz7zhem7X86sAIF+wA KYtv0O6U9wenB+TiyYtPb9gHIUAR3+SP0BlK8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mhSRZqGgAWcEm6jv1WxWXjJ/Ge9Oclp09WEjLuGS389O5EXZLOFs+s/T0YN3uaxXys RCXJHTxJECpSMbDzfafHaxRoo10VNotMIwnrbJAsmKt+aRbXTrfkGz0pappWEiBhkvvT N83t+CsxI47Xhy97w5xpSRS0QzI9VDXCqB828=
- In-reply-to: <dc05cc2c0910271058y11e2872by3cba47501b8a78@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <dc05cc2c0910271058y11e2872by3cba47501b8a78@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Charles Walker
<charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{
>
> Some players are more equal than others (AI = 3, II = 1)
>
> Repeal Rule 1.
>
> }}
But then somebody might fail to treat B Right Good Forever.
(Note: this wording is dumb. "Good Forever" is a distinct line on the
pope cards referring to their lack of expiration; the instruction is
to merely to treat popes right.)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss