Craig Daniel on Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:06:12 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.


On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Kerim Aydin <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Charles Walker wrote:
>> While I agree that Agora is not at war with B, I don't think a war has
>> to involve the majority of a nomic's players; supposedly me and Wooble
>> managed this fine on our own, and I'd be surprised to hear of any real
>> war which occurred in the last century or so which involved the
>> majority of a nation's citizens as soldiers.
>
> It's possible that Agora (or one of the representatives of its military)
> committed an act of agression against B, but there was no formal
> declaration on that side.  HOWEVER, on this side, B reacted in classic
> fashion to an act of agression and legally (i.e. through judgement)
> declared that a state of war existed.  So B has declared itself at war
> with Agora.

A. Judgements that are appealed aren't legal decisions that something
is true before the appeal is resolved.

B. That particular appeal failed only because the judgement
platonically never existed.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss