Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.

0x44 on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:10:33 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:10:30 +0000
In-reply-to: <4ADDEDEB.1000506@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4ADDE222.7020301@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20910200941v4ea03f42ob697f6ed71ee5b31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45f964540910200947w38cf9274o9950ed302518222c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ADDEDEB.1000506@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: RoundCube Webmail


On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:05:47 -0700, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxx
> 
> Having received 2 support, I appeal the judgement in question.

This fails as the judgment in question was IMPOSSIBLE. I purported to
change my posture to STANDING, but rule 101 states: 

      A player CAN flip eir posture to any non-standing value by
      announcement.

The CFJ was not answered, and therefore cannot have been appealed.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.
Next by Date: [s-d] A different rule-making game that might be of interest.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] No.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread