| M P Darke on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:38:24 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergent. |
Wait. Where was the suggestion that that was saying I hadn't read the rules? That was a suggestion that some Players were, in fact, in the dark about the rules.
--- On Tue, 13/10/09, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergent.
To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, 13 October, 2009, 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] No Subject?
Sender: M P Darke add
Recipient: discussion list for B Nomic add
Date: Thu 14:11
It is still a legitimate concern, or at least, it is to those of us who
haven't read the rules.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:07:01 -0700 (PDT), M P Darke
<darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Um... Where did I say that?
>
> --- On Tue, 13/10/09, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I can believe you when you say you haven't,
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss