|
Craig Daniel on Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:11:13 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:03:22 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sAWdlPpkKKeCVK0rDk7khMqV5kgLfiMvuLzN676La0g=; b=SvQb9zOPmfaVEDgvTMO4i2qufns/+ftNyE0vE7KZCZJt9dLpTIr73E5MaA5SG8h5r/ Y9JiXZRaTyBTgyjZh9mLKXvoA0p44bNOUk8EtZfIX1hko76PZUwK2lE24zI2Jn/i4Vzi qRx95TnFqJhUpnHb17S6Q6WJbr1PVtaZjdRA8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JqyahJ0OQLcMlF5j0NGNwy41mkgFPYyks9hh2smlqaqXlAc8cOj+rcRGqqAy9UeV/d bq3O385tdjPOx30gKKI1VsSaJYOMdOSGGuWbRNWuEmq6/E+2Fv6vQNZJy0NniDLr9r4Z HDYhgJCiBM0S5IGy4juVR5Cv86M3AOASEj8HY=
- In-reply-to: <170348.29763.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <653283240910121027s46d3230g56b07f3de6bddb96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <170348.29763.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:38 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Okay, Maybe it should be a Majority Consent of Active B.
Emergency protocols might take effect as a result of large difficulty
determining who that is, so the best metric of who cares right now is
who *votes* right now.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss