Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?

[M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wrong grounds: Just because yours was the only RP does not neccesarily mean it should automatically win. To that end:
I submit a proposal:
Append to the rule entitled "Emergencies" the text:
"While B is in a state of emergency, unless there is more than one RP, the Emergency cannot end."

--- On Fri, 9/10/09, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d]  maybe we should retry the emergency?
To: "B Nomic Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 9 October, 2009, 2:18 AM

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:09 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:31:40 +0100, Charles Walker
> <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:28 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I object, there was no scam.
>>
>> Well, the fact that if there is only one RP it automatically wins is a
>> pretty big loophole. Whether it is the fault of the rules, or the
>> players for not submitting RPs or not, is debatable.
>
> It would have won anyway, I was the only PEP to cast a vote.

To be fair, if anyone else had submitted a proposal I wouldn't have
submitted mine.

But I still object.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss