Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?

Charles Walker on Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:38:14 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
From: Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:31:40 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iWHV4lTGFdmDZzXYdODzcFlRts1ruaAJlIcgKG84Nrs=; b=DS53cU5vwRXpCNnbBiZDSBJSyOj6Nj7OLMEK0SQY/MT0f7If2q8dx0s1a/s4VUXvh/ fJvU3oC67wkEecslX8z0tqmkO+rg9/efvpe670uHIKuTtXhACABKdvNeHTocOe1RpNoG KWEuodAtVDpNJGaodWG+Z3uy4d8FzRtXfJ82E=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=p/+pmSJ4g+0pX/E/r8f1s8E2yx5JJDhqbD7pMIhtfTd46Rt/XwzkmWuerJ9m9NxV+I TanqbUTzJUkWZuIg2M/JRv1rvXSUKkUFF58F2paBUMae7EUeN6isSpbFDhORhtnsBVTa n6b6btzcGEPHXrvS1ticnT873fqgQqzbxmhRA=
In-reply-to: <2d3f17cb2b301b98177300588ee81bd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <SNT109-W252CF68D04DF8C84967C6185CC0@xxxxxxx> <dc05cc2c0910081323o1ad6f43ctdfb3098e0bcf0037@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d3f17cb2b301b98177300588ee81bd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:28 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I object, there was no scam.

Well, the fact that if there is only one RP it automatically wins is a
pretty big loophole. Whether it is the fault of the rules, or the
players for not submitting RPs or not, is debatable.

-- 
Charles Walker
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread