Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity

Geoffrey Spear on Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:24:35 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:24:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <419765.20751.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240910071138r5fab8822m84aa7daa325c5603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <419765.20751.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:23 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It made perfect sense given the circumstances: someone assigned a CFJ to someone, and said that they were the only "standing, unambiguously active" player. Therefore, I wouldlike to know whether I am unambiguously active.

Yes.  You're not standing.


-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity
  - From: M P Darke

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity
  - From: M P Darke

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Activity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread