Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 1985-1987

Ed Murphy on Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:24:25 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 1985-1987

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 1985-1987
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:19:22 -0700
In-reply-to: <653283240908130605h41f34df5x392dff9b334ddbab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240908100646y3ca3c94bn9be2433e240bfc17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240908130605h41f34df5x392dff9b334ddbab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Wooble wrote:

>> 1987 D 2 2.0 JamesB              NTime
> AGAINST; I don't think we need Yet Another Office, plus having a
> weekly report about something that changes daily is, well, something.

The second objection is not particularly well-founded IMO; it's not
necessary to report the clock values every day, just often enough
that intermediate values can be calculated with reasonable effort.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ
Next by Date: [s-d] Bureaucrat Straw Poll
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 1985-1987
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Deputy Gardener] Gnome Report
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread