|
Craig Daniel on Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:34:25 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] Merge the Notary and Registrar?
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] Merge the Notary and Registrar?
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:34:19 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HgE/0E7nbitzCV83gjYItv+5GTuUogJ6nLfMN8W+pGU=; b=VSfcfylO/J5GwgwzkZWCYsA3L9OxeS4KaEs+JQdNkQealXTqdkpJVNYlw7tTt6obu5 e7K8D7/pTxcpjSMsgB/P7R84eLdY0QwGZTs2x8M9qm4nwFBT3OqhS59YvdXo0peWxNhj MyYPY3adQcKOc2JtuZdMaeq3PsesSwspBtths=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=L7ZonheDe77xNdn4XmUWwlfF4ok/MnNLYSpRCScNfn2JgBx1fGS4kuw0QuQuO5DS6/ g3FfB1MtoQTKWpxYawoxPJnq5Y8HefXHtOVUKywacPutHMiRo5zyP7DDgUHogh3vbNuT yYk8+Iw30W0dWUxmMk/EiEdB9tfTR7zRxeMks=
- In-reply-to: <dc05cc2c0906271029v6921ab03g734c0e1c3b1149c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <dc05cc2c0906271029v6921ab03g734c0e1c3b1149c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:29 PM,
C-walker<charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What does everyone think about merging the offices of Notary and
> Registrar? The Notary currently has a grand total of zero public
> contracts to track and the registrar has a similarly low workload.
> Also, the Registrar tracked "Agreements" and "Factions" before we went
> all Agoran, so this fits with the theme of re-Bifying the ruleset. Any
> other comments?
FOR.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss