Roger Hicks on Mon, 25 May 2009 21:49:48 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] [CotC] CFJ 5 assigned to Judge 0x44 |
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 22:03, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Roger Hicks wrote: >> >> This is CFJ 5. I assign it to Judge 0x44. >> >> 5 (District Inquiry) >> The page at >> >> http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=User:Wooble/Proposed_Ruleset&oldid=11379 >> contains an accurate rendition of the text of each of the current >> rules. > > The first line of Proposal 1945 states clearly that the entire ruleset is to > be replaced with the contents of the page at the above historical Bn wiki > link. To do so would require the complete removal of the original ruleset > and the subsequent (and necessarily simultaneous) emplacement of the new > rules. Since no individual rule was specified, the ruleset was repealed and > enacted in toto. Additionally, it seems improper to set aside a UNANIMOUS > decision on a Democratic proposal, any ambiguity that may have arisen from > Proposal 1945 must be ignored in deference to the will of the Players. > > I answer CFJ 5 TRUE. > I claim this answer to be consistent. Oh, wait.....wrong era. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss