Roger Hicks on Mon, 25 May 2009 21:49:48 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [CotC] CFJ 5 assigned to Judge 0x44


On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 22:03, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>
>> This is CFJ 5. I assign it to Judge 0x44.
>>
>> 5 (District Inquiry)
>> The page at
>>
>> http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=User:Wooble/Proposed_Ruleset&oldid=11379
>> contains an accurate rendition of the text of each of the current
>> rules.
>
> The first line of Proposal 1945 states clearly that the entire ruleset is to
> be replaced with the contents of the page at the above historical Bn wiki
> link. To do so would require the complete removal of the original ruleset
> and the subsequent (and necessarily simultaneous) emplacement of the new
> rules. Since no individual rule was specified, the ruleset was repealed and
> enacted in toto. Additionally, it seems improper to set aside a UNANIMOUS
> decision on a Democratic proposal, any ambiguity that may have arisen from
> Proposal 1945 must be ignored in deference to the will of the Players.
>
> I answer CFJ 5 TRUE.
>
I claim this answer to be consistent.

Oh, wait.....wrong era.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss