Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Assessor] Voting Results for Proposals 1945-1949

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:42 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:36 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Proposal 1945 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by Wooble
> >> Decruft
> >> Replace the entire ruleset with the one found at
> >> http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=User:Wooble/Proposed_Ruleset&oldid=11379
> >>
> >> Set all of the properties of all of the rules, including their ID
> >> numbers and Powers, to those found in that document.
> >
> > It's unclear whether this is meant to repeal all rules and enact new
> > ones, or amend rules as necessary to hold the new text; and in any
> > case an ordering to the rule changes (which probably makes a
> > difference in such a large set, just ask Suber) is not specified.
> > Accordingly, this fails by Rule 105.
> 
> I CFJ on: {{The page at
> http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=User:Wooble/Proposed_Ruleset&oldid=11379
> contains an accurate rendition of the text of each of the current
> rules.}}
> 
> Arguments: The rule change was specified clearly enough to meet B's
> game customs.
> 
> I nominate Tiger as Rulekeepor.

Let's just throw in a few more illegal ratifications...

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss