| Charles Walker on Sun, 10 May 2009 01:40:38 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] point of order |
Between the two or three RPs that I posted, there is almost no difference, just the pastebin where the ruleset is hosted and a couple of minor edits to the rules such as adding "blank" to some of the rules that I've left blank. Also, I believe this ranked pairs voting is due to the fact that if there is a tie there will be a second ballot between the tying RPs. C-walker On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Wooble wrote: > > > Rule 0 allows each PEP to submit 1 RP; they cannot be revised. You > > can also vote for a single RP; there's no ranked pairs voting. > > What would be messed up if the first version of c-walker's RP > passed? If it's bad enough, we can de-Panic (stopping the current > procedure) and try again. > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss