Re: [s-d] [s-b] point of order

0x44 on Sat, 9 May 2009 22:24:53 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] point of order

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] point of order
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 00:22:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <653283240905092118r438029c8g2c476ccf4e1d34f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240905092118r438029c8g2c476ccf4e1d34f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)

Geoffrey Spear wrote:

Rule 0 allows each PEP to submit 1 RP; they cannot be revised.  You
can also vote for a single RP; there's no ranked pairs voting.

Hence why I stated that my vote degraded gracefully.

--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Second Option
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] point of order
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Second Option
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] point of order
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread