| Jonatan Kilhamn on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:21:21 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] InterNomic |
I meant that if e wasn't joking, and didn't have a satisfying explanation, e wouldn't notice it and the judgment would get through anyway. And by the way, I don't see forum posts about either Agora or B joining the game, but they're on the members page. Have they applied privately, or what? 2009/4/17 Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I'm not sure whether he was joking or not; I'm just pointing out that it > doesn't count as an objection until it is posted on the proper forum. > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> I did notice, and if e was serious I hoped that e would either explain >> why, or not notice it, or both.You mean e was joking? >> >> 2009/4/17 Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > He didn't. Note the mailing list. >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn >> > <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >> > >> >> 2009/4/15 Kenner Gordon <kennercat@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> > I object to Warrigal's judging. >> >> > >> >> Why would we want IN2 to be judged broken? >> >> >> -- >> -Tiger >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> > > > > -- > C-walker > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- -Tiger _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss