Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:55:19 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yet More Proposals |
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Charles Walker < charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Replace the text of the Rule "Assigning Ministries" with the following: > > { > > There is an Attribute Democracy Level with a Scope of all Ministries, a > Range of Undemocratic, Semi-Democratic or Democratic, and a Default Value > of > Undemocratic. > > A Player may, as a Game Action, assign a Vacant, Undemocratic Ministry to > himself. > > A Player may, as a Game Action, with 2 support and without 2 objections, > assign a Vacant, Semi-Democratic Ministry to himself. > > A Player may, as a Game Action, with a Quorum of support, assign a Vacant, > Democratic Ministry to himself. > > } > > Cause the Ministry of Questions to become Semi-Democratic. > > } > No. :) I like the idea of democratic ministires if it means players have some say in who runs what, in principle. But for this proposal to work it needs to a) not allow objections for ministry assignments (because this introduces an automatic 2 rday (or is it nday now in which case it would completely break the clock)) delay at the start of any nweek, because all ministries become vacant then and all need to be filled before the Clock is turned on. B is just coming out of a slump and we can't have that sort of delay when everyone is raring to get out there and stab people. An alternative would be to make up some exception to the no-objection provision to allow for the assignments (generally just hte first in an nweek i guess) to happen regardless of objection (ie as soon as support is gotten) if they would otherwise hold up the clock. b) if democratic ministries require a quorum of support to be assigned to a player, they should also require that much support to be usurped. c) i think this is intended and i can see why that could be a good idea, but just to make sure: you did mean to allow objections on semi-democratic ministries but not on democratic ones, right? BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss