| Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:00:40 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Vote Power |
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 0x44 wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:27:44 +0000 (GMT), M P Darke > > <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I answer this Consultation YES, but only because it make life simpler, > as > >> there is now a precedent. > > > > I claim this Answer to be Inconsistent, but only because I think another > > priest will give a more reasoned Answer. > > You can't, the alleged Answer was NttPF. But yeah, Marr965, either > re-post with actual reasoning or I'll be joining 0x44. And just to facilitate everything: might as well either re-post with actual reasoning or just ask Murphy to reassign the Consultation to a different priest - will save us having to go through whatever period of time is necessary to receive claims of inconsistency and then end up with the same result: reassignment. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss