Re: [s-d] [s-b] proposal: schism

Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:23:47 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] proposal: schism

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] proposal: schism
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:17:20 -0400
In-reply-to: <6bf32280903301448t5985fd92we38941ff5751e7d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240903300915v27e65418ga2846183daeca24c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280903301448t5985fd92we38941ff5751e7d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:48 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So how's expel_comex doing over at PerlNomic?

slightly better than buy_organic, which shows that people don't want
PerlNomic to stop being an Agora player but don't care about the
actions that will make it happen.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] proposal: schism
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] proposal: schism
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 157
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] proposal: schism
Next by thread: [s-d] Please Treat As Urgent is confidential.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread