Re: [s-d] [s-b] Trade

[Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Gratuitous: Most definitely, Hit Points are distinct from the type of Points
defined in Rule 2-4. That said, by any ordinary language definition, "Hit
Points" are a type of point. References to "points" contained elsewhere in
the ruleset (e.g. Rules 3-10 and 3-11) do not specify which type of points
they are meant to refer to - both interpretations may therefore be used
where this does not give rise to a conflict (e.g. 3-10 and 3-11, contrast to
2-6).

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Jamie Dallaire
> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > No, I mean hit points.
> >
> > Hit Points are Points though, right?
>
> Consultation: {{Can a Hit Point be exchanged for 5 macks?}}
> Unbeliever: Billy Pilgrim
>
> Reasoning: Yes, "Hit Point" contains the word "Point", but otherwise
> it seems fairly clear from the Rules that they're entirely different
> types of Game Objects.
> --
> Wooble
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss