M P Darke on Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:07:23 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: precedence system 

That's not how I remember it... Oh well...

--- On Mon, 9/3/09, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b]   Proposal: precedence system
To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, 9 March, 2009, 5:54 PM



On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:47:36 +0000 (GMT), M P Darke
<darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wasn't there a big hoo-haa about it when someone tried to change the
Rules
> because their Contract said they could modify the Contract by removing
one
> Rule and adding another?

This proposal creates a Rule that explicitly grants the Minister of Law the
power to do something. The other was wholly different, and didn't happen
anyway because the rules he was using weren't the rules of B Nomic.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss