M P Darke on Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:47:44 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: precedence system |
Wasn't there a big hoo-haa about it when someone tried to change the Rules because their Contract said they could modify the Contract by removing one Rule and adding another? On a side note, a malapropism is where you say one thing and mean your mother... --- On Mon, 9/3/09, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: precedence system To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Monday, 9 March, 2009, 5:25 PM On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:22:57 +0000 (GMT), M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Actually, I was refering to the "The Minister of Law Must remove this > paragraph" bit... > It authorizes him to do so, what's your problem? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss