Craig Daniel on Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:06:13 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] btb


On 3/4/09, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 16:44 +0000, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> I register.
>>
>> Proposal: Back to business
>> {
>> Set the gamestate to what it would be if Era 5
>> started and events continued as normal, except
>> with the paragraph defining Comment Text
>> removed.
>> }
>
> Please explicitly define this gamestate. In B, I've decided that I will
> no longer support any gamestate-replacing proposal (which is what this
> would be) that does not explicitly Approve everything, or set everything
> to a known value. Otherwise, we just end up with unknown gamestate.

It would be the same as it is, except with that paragraph struck.

...wait, you mean in the game you're playing? Good question.

:p

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss