|
Warrigal on Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:02:05 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: GameBoard
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: GameBoard
- From: Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:01:51 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5jCVPtLJWPoZWIC5MsdRh8UmACp2SklRIjXThvJFIMg=; b=Le6bREEy2MB63fuDxxE7Ogu/eVvVHDSIvjTxoZX/8wzlyAM9dHjecYxXwfQnG8+fkl LpvcUZ1Yv6OX/RfTvFHi8U0LoIq8DFz9s2jFKvAcJatEuvS29daCJWPT2GqQ/Qhm8Dk6 6lGXY/EAK46XUqHc0VIX1xlv9D/O/wjhUvAUM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rW+XIJEEREigdRfJUZ2yZeAc6oqiwN022VLC3QqkDhRj3Rd9nINwVGot939/DfKiYW YjqZSSQ5NPEhziEkbaJlQtnkrRuuM3OKxcV3OMoEqCPczfBg/ilTdu8K+pbo6EjtHvcz wk3ukn1q1BRgAdI8mb7iEyHj1HMH0z1KrclAI=
- In-reply-to: <1de9d4fc0903040844s3537f011w4ed8ed08ee3bb60b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <f37bdddc51610f266f91562c150bff87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1de9d4fc0903040844s3537f011w4ed8ed08ee3bb60b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:44 AM, David E. Smith <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I just realized something. Since there are multiple, mutuallty-contradictory
> gamestates for B, and at least one half-hearted effort to revive A, should
> players of any/all of those games specify what game submissions are intended
> for?
No.
--Buddha Warrigal
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss