Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah

Geoffrey Spear on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:05:58 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:05:50 -0500
In-reply-to: <7db5cba20902171007h620071ebsb6a708d2fb695e47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240902170935i62d3c706q2885db4a69290bd4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20902171007h620071ebsb6a708d2fb695e47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I vote FOR the proposal "A proposal that will get rejected".

That proposal is not Open this nweek.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ignore the problem and paper over it later.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread