Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order

Geoffrey Spear on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:48:35 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:48:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <49961D90.5070006@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <ca8a6ddc0902131609h53a86313h9404cdb53ebfe7bb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49961D90.5070006@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Cassie Bayer wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Hi, who're you?

non-person sock puppet, whose POOs are probably invalid.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
  - From: Cassie Bayer

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread