Re: [s-d] Request to become a Player

Ed Murphy on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:32:42 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Request to become a Player

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Request to become a Player
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:32:51 -0800
In-reply-to: <ca8a6ddc0902131257v1be9aeafnd1b6c9323012cf9a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <ca8a6ddc0902131257v1be9aeafnd1b6c9323012cf9a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Kisse BNomic wrote:

> * Requests to become a Player identified as "Kisse"

Oh, that's who you are.  My bad for replying to s-b before catching
up on s-d.

Would someone paying more attention please let me know when the
gamestate has (by consensus) been set to what it would have been
if all of the recently-alleged Horribly Broken Things had actually
always worked the way we previously thought they did?

Until said consensus is reached, is there any point in my doing
anything further with (the wiki page previously generally known
as) the Justice PD?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] Request to become a Player
  - From: Kisse BNomic

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
Previous by thread: [s-d] Request to become a Player
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Request to become a Player
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread