Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration

Cassie Bayer on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:58:17 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
From: Cassie Bayer <kisse.bnomic@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:58:11 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2cF+V8lYYEpxnSjIonXYAyiMak7ZljB8oQGhlY7f0dE=; b=J0HisfsJRimsQ7ikPEDxD1l8eFDsuV2aVwfkWQkYuIu/D3HS5Yk/ysx2qg74V6p7y8 JeQDl1/bUOxfjRXSvhAlG4I3SrCPuMi4GiMkkIWwLQAuvuXP30PPbrdlLl8WFfgTfPxu qbT5P2zsRuY2dv40cr6eox/i8OHyUvMJg3Quw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wyLn9O5erXqdcm+mhkDSyc9C/ocXLvtQCSVw4E8QnsrBuy2S5s+WdF7YTfEa7u91Tz NpplPtT4cD0Lz7t7B0lt/gxtgZ83CQHa+zCtW11hrOu/r2cpSTcBykGVPZnxei/OWRKh ZPwWnnco9UQwLlzwS9wh4G2QItvDP/sKezQCE=
In-reply-to: <49960837.3020609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240902131324k591aa5e0u8dff9e01fd859cac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ca8a6ddc0902131505k5f94aad9i6993308bcb2ea592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <71f4ee8a0787e9a6f511fcb0be5d2fd5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ca8a6ddc0902131531t6dec7f4dmc42fa25a016a34fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49960837.3020609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/2/13 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Cassie Bayer wrote:
>
>> In keeping with this idea, Point of Order, the following rule shall be
>> enacted: "All rules except this one must be written in Lojban" ;)
>>
>>
> What's a Rule?
>

Good point.  We need a rule that bootstraps itself by defining what a rule
is. >_<

Well, as long as we're going for eleven...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
  - From: Cassie Bayer
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
  - From: bnomic
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
  - From: Cassie Bayer
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Point of Order
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread