Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration

[Cassie Bayer <kisse.bnomic@xxxxxxxxx>]

2009/2/13 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>

> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Cassie Bayer <kisse.bnomic@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > How pedantic should we expect this game to be run?  Say, on a scale of 1
> to
> > 10, where 1 would be "quite lenient" to 10 "excruciatingly pedantic so
> much
> > so that we need justify the existence of the game existentially"?
>
> If you're anywhere below about an eight or nine, the game doesn't
> meaningfully exist because there's another B Nomic out there that's
> working just fine, thank you.
>
> B's sweet spot has historically been around eight or so; if you're
> looking for less pedantry you should check out Agora, which lives in
> the neighborhood of three.


Oh, I have no problem dealing with Ãber-high-levels of pedantry.  If we want
to get super Ãber-pedantic, then we should use the rules as they exist
should be used to "bootstrap" an entirely different set of rules.
 Considering the rules only allow for changing anything within the first two
days.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss