Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:34:14 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
From: Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:34:08 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZvroF6OErMsjzukaDQReqILjsypR/YkumBcnVe20HiE=; b=IGn0mfmZX6mtoN446o68hIdQpZtEmeOiCPfqWcxzmv/ddj0Vjw3AF06CrQ9FKOQsJ+ 7fgUJy3FOnwwN8o4bq5ceH/RD6hPk9E83/y3ZVZELbT9am2nWgos8k9xRcVP7M5fk6Yv Zg4KOMqBhaMhxr9ocHGzjGRV4t9zuaLQw//sk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YR1xzl+tFrEoyA25l3AgmAcgHh1TSt5bErbwvQNxT306buPOlekKUVrqTd9ujNQYgH PHRNC49F0deMEUt9NUax2+D+D+VjRf9/C3FINY4mPFbu3OK/PeV3yWRwkKDfEmc8YLTu D8/HrtwS+qJ6fxMjLbK/KaWg2tUDi8vbOHhpQ=
In-reply-to: <653283240902091010r4cb05b13q254f5530099b8e30@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <846644.35965.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902090947u594610a5kebde3bd8d6df25f4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650902091008w6c50f67co7d127fc17e8142e9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240902091010r4cb05b13q254f5530099b8e30@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > What about when the quoted text was never actually written by the
> purported
> > source?
> >
> > e.g. ehird said: I give all my macks to BP.
>
> Umm, quoted actions shouldn't happen at all at the time they're quoted.
>
> (ttdf, so I don't give all my macks to BP by sending this)

I agree with Wooble 100 % here. I really don't think quoted messages
(fictional or real) are to be treated as having been performed by the
quoter. I was just pointing out that ehird's blanket exception was a little
large.
BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Elliott Hird

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread