Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator

comex on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:25:27 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:25:21 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FV2/hnrfzwMpC27LRbdexoqWHj58eOLM6q2byjri/eI=; b=uIvgV1xB31IWmV0d+ANmqCNFLI/dFhbP/+8n3HdkgDNgJ6tqQOu2wELyopYdiQLcLb Qrd1jgp+CksPXf02eh7lljDmoXT0/8XFBQIlS0ZMHrEXO9DBRxYsVt8V+evC8DYJn5Ob u1f25h9YDB7MotwawOSvrsdVjX03DOYvB2nf4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wPMRyZp+uZ+6fGauuQILK5sQKwwTg/ZlaDtEt6YWGdGFXgs/pZdLwSgJtM+YdKrKTj CkeQgb6O3dUNq0WEnrNkBBUWvCDU1XUXmv6ykE9ZeYMStWTYsUI/VpXj31FMKl0fpx6P npD+rsJ47Xe97lL1L+Mk/qTGt/RCVV8ez5fMc=
In-reply-to: <1234210822.8108.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1234204154.8108.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234205001.8108.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902091054p59e0e76dv1a6cd7f6fd3187e5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0d1c6ccd8a5634a820cd7867ce45589c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902091118l7f62dde8y6952c150be3e4bd5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <95e6ea740d7b8663bf9b02c437a60208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234208570.8108.38.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280902091217n28cc06d6v8544b7867fe265c6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234210822.8108.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Agora has self-ratification, which hopefully has suppressed most of the
> bugs since it was introduced. B should probably have a working version
> of it, too.

Didn't we figure out at some point that ratification-without-objection
hasn't worked until a few months ago because Rule 1728's Power was
only 2? :)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
  - From: Alex Smith

References:
- [s-d] Massive Gamestate Realculation
  - From: Alex Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
  - From: bnomic
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
  - From: bnomic
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
  - From: Alex Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
  - From: Alex Smith

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread