Re: [s-d] [s-b] Reassignment

Elliott Hird on Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:53:02 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Reassignment

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Reassignment
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:53:11 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from :subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=ct3lXYcX3q/BcCIH9WpaDD/+Wp5n0wBydn6TEBo+UZM=; b=DE3Dd4tA5VZFQbIaDt+EBoyHwKLTTjYW9Qyi3xoRIbS0QWDwHkz3FN3kb2EV3tDKXP VG4DIfMlwi1BZZvUdp+2kCeD/uBXpZsWk0ApZI+1/ImD854vG2ng3JgLGfW1pMh+ZBtt 09gqEzppR9hBKLSEewPNh3bBf5VDgPCiR7owQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=D4pp/n6IZFf0tgDJucVnqCY3hrU/dHy2FMTtc3QUe9uomDmJR4S0p6Xuz9zzwD8Ms0 PuvCsOnThl6HqRMhNv+NNvM5phk3+PaWhWiQzuQK12b3c6yKkxDk71uqyQvzaklhkSQm glrBOztSGcaDTXoVZN2eVMruUyq+Eb+3ILAvI=
In-reply-to: <BAY126-W370E8DCD6BA24DCD238E7285C20@xxxxxxx>
References: <4983E11A.2020708@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <501895.36135.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49876252.30400@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <498764BF.4040307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W370E8DCD6BA24DCD238E7285C20@xxxxxxx>


On 3 Feb 2009, at 07:50, James Baxter wrote:

I claim this to be CONSISTENT as it is identical to the answer Isubmitted.


Are there any actual arguments this way...? I can't see why the scam
wouldn't work.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's get this sorted out...
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Reassignment
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's get this sorted out...
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Reassignment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread