Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

[Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2 Feb 2009, at 19:27, Jamie Dallaire wrote:

> I don't know if macks actually have "names" (just like no one has  
> argued
> that a weapon's name is "weapon", but only that the form of the rule
> actually does give weapons names), but if they do then I guess we'd  
> all have
> 50 but not have received any for proposals or whatnot???

No, we all have 0. But no name != no name, just like NaN != NaN.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss