Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

Ed Murphy on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:55:09 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:56:27 -0800
In-reply-to: <6bf32280902020923m24e4beabr5508925581406714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <349823.2095.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280902020923m24e4beabr5508925581406714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

comex wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:06 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I have to say, that sounds ridiculous. I find this (if I can) INCONSISTENT.
> 
> AOL!

On the grounds that BINA, I interpret this as a reasonably unambiguous
synonym for "Me too!".

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread