Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 196 on ehird and the time rip

Elliott Hird on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:51:09 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 196 on ehird and the time rip

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 196 on ehird and the time rip
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:51:15 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from :subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=UMSheSbzV6s4cqdaN+wWtRB0DakHOiUDOrlWRWyChTE=; b=ISxpAhrB9B59z4HEVfLBev70yk4LZybSUe4lyDCa6NHOatySqKE8+NFJ6M5koIj0ei JohTq9OQxJYalUiM+yanV865iYiuLYZ1lWuRNNVf3GM2KtN2J+IYN/+YcPXd27HwIWEX zU47+EenoIkrky2P3rXSIm2zO5p63lZLGSfPs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=uJoe4n1Pqwi2yHX6PWVQaYmyBWscX4UVw3qUBiEOgS6aJcbcGoYWzm7mzRWY2eAC/d 44iSEyVy03Q4YvedGEB2Uo5cUp0B2gZfgkcKty9RdJOH9aXGdzBwQwuLq42JbJ89i6An 93luTuddyL9lCb28NXG1BIzb71wUHDP8Od89M=
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650901301429q6de6f3aci8c4f3d46b0a0b2d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dbedf4da0901212240r37fce77di86c9735ffcb15ba8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901291953w73693bfdtd3b422947702cce3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E4A7D828-695C-4CC1-9083-DBDFB8299C65@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901300751k33aeb340r65f708a8da7cd447@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56159FFD-2E2C-4C35-AC93-254B1766C16E@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901300835v47423b74h2e64ba87779cd626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F9DB71F8-D608-4FCE-93F9-6EC06FA5B41E@xxxxxxxxx> <49833CCF.1050505@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901301429q6de6f3aci8c4f3d46b0a0b2d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


On 30 Jan 2009, at 22:29, Jamie Dallaire wrote:

I SUPPORT the Activation of the above Tweak submitted by Murphy.ehird still
has to submit his.

The submission was in the same action, as I labeled it as the"following Tweak".

If you want to argue for that interpretation, which isn't backed upby the rules,

then we have some serious gamestate recalculation to do.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 196 on ehird and the time rip
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 196 on ehird and the time rip
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 196 on ehird and the time rip
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 196 on ehird and the time rip
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 196 on ehird and the time rip
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread