Alex Smith on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:52:36 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 203 |
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 17:47 -0500, teucer@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > In Agora, judgments tend to be rooted in what's good for the game. In > B, we tend to suck it up and start having an emergency when somebody > breaks the game. Technically speaking, Agoran judgements are only rooted in what's good for the game if there rules are silent on the issue, or otherwise ambiguous (Agoran rule 217). Besides, IMO scams are part of the game in any nomic, and blanket-blocking them is itself not for the good of the game. In B, we try to go with exactly what the rules say, because otherwise (and especially atm, now we don't have Oracularities) it would be very easy for players of B to be playing different nomics, depending on what they thought was correct at the time. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss