Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

[Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 23 Jan 2009, at 16:30, Craig Daniel wrote:

> Priests should not have been fixing ruleset problems with
> Oracularities, because people should feel free to agree with a
> judgment that there is a problem regardless of whether they like the
> proposed fix. Oracularities are, however, nice ways of writing the
> ruleset into a slightly clearer form. Fixes, on the other hand, can be
> implemented with proposals (if they're controversial) or Tweaks (if
> they aren't, which an urgently-needed fix shouldn't be).

I agree here: oracularities should be for clarification.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss