| Tyler on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:01:55 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 202 on Early motnw Change |
A very good point; I hadn't thought of it that way before. Now, since we're
all in agreement, mind if I ZOT this Consultation? Of course I'll assign if
you want.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Oh, and please call your arguments "Reasoning" or I might not archive it.
> > (Being under no obligation.)
>
> I submit the following Consultation:
> {{
> Question: Is text included with a Consultation that clarifies the
> intent of the Consultation Reasoning, even if it's not labeled as
> such?
>
> ARGUMENTS: Rule 5E36 defines thusly: Reasoning, meaning text that
> clarifies the intent of the Consultation.
>
> Unbeliever: Tyler
> }}
>
> --
> Wooble
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
--
-Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss