| Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:42:49 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's not do the time warp again, please |
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > If the previous nweek passed virtually, >>> >>> >> >> >> how/why/when >> >> > > There was a logical twist to implementation of the Era 5 initial Refresh > Proposal that required the clock to be forwarded an nweek on the Public > Display. Today's ratification of the new time meant Wooble and ehird could > rejoin, because according to the clock an nweek just passed. If so, there > are other consequences. Oh, never noticed we're now at 154. Weird. Hmmm so e.g. did the Beast do anything on 153-9, e.g. when that never actually happened? I would think not. Also, what happens to a proposal submitted in 153, when the game skips ahead to 154 before the voting period? Guess its status never changed from pending... BUT I do think that lets Wooble/ehird rejoin (well, unless they were players in 153, can't remember). Where's the ministry of time when we need it? (not that it would do ANYTHING for us here...) _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss