Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:51:59 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Point of Order! |
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 10:43 -0500, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > > I'd also be somewhat more inclined to vote for this if, because the > ability > > to select an emergency forum is mercifully gone but this means that if > spoon > > breaks we are screwed, it added some other non-spoon forum > (bnomicemergency > > perhaps) as a public forum. > It allows designation of new Public Fora dynamically during emergencies > if all the existing ones are screwed up in some way (such as mail > problems, or scamster activity). gah, I didn't read it as carefully as I thought (also applies to 0x44's response concerning 4th absolute day). Perhaps, though, it should be made explicit that designating an alternate forum is the Chairman's job/power. Right now, it only says an alternate "may be designated". Which will get us into trouble as soon as spoon fails. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss