Craig Daniel on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:28:17 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Greycorp...


On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If the number of Macks owned by Grey is less that 50 at any time, Greycorp
>> transfers 100 macks.
>
> This would fail every time, as it wouldn't have the macks to transfer.
>
>> Greycorp may possess Weapons.
>
> MacQuitterkin's snippiness is unhelpful, but this really does nothing.
> Just because it allows itself to possess weapons does not mean the
> rules make it possible for it to do so.
>
>> nweek thus specified to Greycorp. They then become the Owner of that Weapon. If
>> they do not transfer the Weapon back to Greycorp at the end of the specified
>> period of time, they must transfer an additional m20 to Greycorp, as well as the
>> Weapon. If a weapon is destroyed by the Player who was lent it, that Player
>> must transfer m30 to Greycorp for damaging the item.
>
>
> Which they can't; attempts to transfer Game Objects to things not
> legally able to own them fail.
>
> Only legal entities and Nobody are able to own Weapons or currency.
> Per rule 5e44, corporations are not Legal Entities.

Wooble has pointed out (on IRC) that I overlooked a piece of rule 5e57
which makes corporations into Legal Entities.

So all of this works except for the part where Greycorp transfers
mackerel it doesn't have.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss