Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 22:34 +0000, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 4 Jan 2009, at 22:04, 0x44 wrote:
> 
> > I submit the following consultation: Is the External Force formerly  
> > known as ehird still a Player?
> 
> I become Ordained. I assign this Consultation the number 9999. I  
> assign this consultation to ehird (myself).
> 
> I answer this consultation YES.
> 
> Reasoning: {
> 
> 5E10 says [[Game Actions which involve calculating things that are  
> unreasonable, impossible or ambiguous fail and have no effect.  
> Determining what meets that criteria is up to Ministries and the  
> Consultation system.]]
> 
> Now, we all know about the ambiguity of my macks (see the arguments  
> over that consultation, the various valid thoughts given on it, etc.)
> 
> My forfeit involves calculating the ambiguous state of my macks as a  
> direct consequence of it.
> 
> Therefore, my forfeit was ineffective. 5E18 does not apply as it has  
> a lower number than 5E10.
> 
> }
I believe this answer to be INCONSISTENT, but I cannot claim it as such
because it was not made legally.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss